Publications
Technology Elites and the Takeover of US Foreign Policy towards Greenland
Shayan Hassan Jamy
Analysis Series
Analysis/0041/June/2026/London-Dialogue. 29 June 2026
Technology Elites and the Takeover of US Foreign Policy towards Greenland
Under the current Trump administration, technology elites – leading figures of major US technology companies – have significantly consolidated their influence over US foreign policy, allowing their technology companies to generate substantial profit and ultimately laying the foundation for further global expansion. This was perhaps most evident through President Trump’s repeated rhetoric and threats surrounding the potential US acquisition of Greenland, a policy decision which was heavily influenced by the interests of technology elites. Although the significant stakes which technology elites hold in acquiring Greenland have been discussed within the media and academic community, the pivotal role they played in shaping President Trump’s aggressive posture is a research area that certainly deserves to be revisited and explored further.
US Foreign Policy towards Greenland
For several senior members of the Trump administration, including President Trump himself, the US “needs” Greenland for its national security, as well as to ensure global stability. In January 2026, President Trump announced tariffs on many European allies until a deal was reached for the “complete and total purchase of Greenland”. Although these tariffs were later reversed, the potential US acquisition of Greenland came as a surprising development for many; Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, which is a close ally of the US and a fellow member of NATO. For technology elites, however, President Trump’s Greenland turn did not appear out of thin air; rather, it was deeply linked to their political, economic and ideological interests.
Interests of Technology Elites
Technology elites in the US have had long-standing ambitions associated with Greenland, with their economic interests surrounding the island’s vast resources garnering the most widespread attention. Greenland has about 12% of the world’s rare earth reserves, which are necessary for everything from smartphones, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, data centres, renewable energy technology, electric vehicle batteries, semiconductors and more. Overall, 25 of 34 minerals considered “critical raw materials” by the European Commission are found in Greenland, including graphite and titanium. Interestingly, these minerals were largely unreachable due to the massive ice sheet which covered 80% of Greenland and have only recently been considered a viable resource due to the effects of climate change.
As a result, technology elites have become increasingly involved in extractive practices through which they aim to harness Greenland’s resources. KoBold Metals, a company which uses AI systems to find copper, cobalt and nickel mines along Greenland’s coastlines, has been largely funded by US technology elites. These funders include Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Similarly, Andreessen and former PayPal CEO Peter Thiel have funded Praxis Nation, a project which has been actively attempting to purchase and govern Greenland. Interestingly, this aspiration to extract Greenland’s resources had been present under the Biden administration as well, with both KoBold and Praxis having lobbied for the use of climate funds for critical mineral mining. It was really under the current Trump administration, however, that the more expansionist ideologies of the technology elite surrounding Greenland were elevated and adopted as the official state policy.
Besides the economic interests of the technology elite in the acquisition of Greenland, their political and ideological motivations have received comparatively less attention. For many prominent members of the US technology elite, Greenland has been designated as the ideal territory from which to build the ‘network-state’, which is defined as a ‘global political project allowing venture capitalists to acquire land, build infrastructure, establish sovereignty and operate as a distributed world power’. Through the acquisition of Greenland, the technology elite aim to establish a ‘new nation’, which operates outside the confines of the international nation-state model, is free from the global regulatory framework, and ultimately has its own sovereignty. Prominent technology elites such as Theil, Musk, Andreessen and others are all proponents of this vision.
The network-state concept is not a conspiracy theory; the technology elite have already actively begun to implement it. In 2024, Praxis founder Dryden Brown had attempted to buy Greenland from Denmark, a move which was outright refused by the Danish government. Brown’s subsequent proposal was to build a new city on Greenland’s uninhabited land – a project he described as a “prototype of Terminus”, the name Musk had selected for his first city on Mars. When these private efforts to acquire Greenland from Denmark failed, technology elites turned to the US government, with the Trump administration increasingly emphasising the need for the US to acquire Greenland.
Influence of Technology Elites
Technology elites have primarily influenced US foreign policy decisions through lobbying and the appointment of officials that share their interests. President Trump’s election campaign, for instance, was largely funded by technology elites, with Elon Musk being the top donor with $243 million. Even under the Biden administration, technology elites had repeatedly lobbied to influence policy decisions in their favour. In 2021, major US technology companies such as Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft and others spent around $70 million in lobbying the US government. Through this lobbying, technology elites have been able to limit regulation on their companies, allowing for greater profits and for the unchecked development of AI and other nascent technologies. One of President Trump’s first executive orders during his second term was the reversal of many of the Biden-era regulations imposed on technology companies. This pattern of funding and lobbying is deeply linked to the Greenland case, with President Trump largely allowing technology elites to dictate US foreign policy in exchange for funding and loyalty.
Technology elites have also had a major role to play in the appointment of senior officials in the Trump administration that support the US acquisition of Greenland. Peter Thiel is a figure who has had tremendous influence in this regard, including in getting US Vice President JD Vance elected. Vance had previously worked for Mithril Capital, a company which was founded by Thiel. Thiel later donated $15 million to Vance’s Senate election campaign and also persuaded President Trump to make him his running mate. JD Vance has been one of the most vocal advocates for the need for the US to acquire Greenland, particularly to stop the threats emanating from China and Russia. Similarly, Peter Thiel had a major role to play in the appointment of fellow PayPal co-founder Ken Howery as the US Ambassador to Denmark, who has been tasked by President Trump to “get control of Greenland”. The central role played by Peter Thiel in the rise of both Vance and Howery to prominent positions within the Trump administration showcases just how deeply entrenched technology elites have become within Washington’s decision-making apparatus.
Technology elites have also consolidated a significant amount of control over critical digital infrastructure, such as data centres, cloud computing infrastructure, semiconductors, and AI-related software and hardware. Today, these technologies are crucial for the functioning of the state, and political and military elites rely on them significantly.
Conclusion
The Greenland saga illustrates clearly how deeply entrenched technology elites have become within Washington’s decision-making apparatus, with the Trump administration’s aggressive stance towards Greenland largely reflecting the interests of elites like Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and others. Through campaign financing, lobbying, and the appointment of sympathetic figures such as Vice President JD Vance and US Ambassador to Denmark Ken Howery, technology elites have significantly dictated and shaped US foreign policy towards Greenland under the current Trump administration. Ultimately, the presence and influence of these technology elites certainly weakens and challenges state authority. Prominent technology elites are primarily concerned with the pursuit of profit and controlling important economic sectors through the monopolisation of critical digital infrastructure.
Shayan Hassan Jamy
Related posts
The Maritime Blockade and the Strategic Calculus of the U.S., Iran, and Israel Toward a Renewed Armed Confrontation
Understanding Asim Munir’s Doctrine: Regime Security in Place of a National Goal
The Data Dilemma: Navigating the AI Systems Matrix
The Anatomy of a Shortfall: Europe’s Nine Capability Areas and the Lessons for Pakistan
From Quiet Diplomacy to Attempted Maritime Security Governance: Oman’s Role and Limits in the 2026 Strait of Hormuz Crisis
Anatomy of Asymmetry: How a Weaker State Converts Vulnerability into Leverage
Integration for Stability: The SDF’s Dissolution and Syria’s Security Order
The Western Flank Unravelled: Cross-Border Militancy, TTP Resurgence, and Afghan Taliban Governance
The Time of Guards Tank Divisions is Gone, or Maybe It is Not?
Re-pricing Israel’s Corridor: The Mecca Alliance and IMEC
The SCO at 25: From Regional Security Mechanism to Platform for a Multipolar Eurasia
Imran Khan: The Last Hope of a Nation
London Dialogue — Founding Statement
Publication Categories
- Analysis (85)
- Book Review (1)
- Commentary (4)
- Essay (7)
- Journal (0)
- Journal Article (0)
- Policy Brief (5)
- Research Article (2)
- Research Report (3)
- Working Paper (0)
- Young Writers Corner (0)