Publications
Pakistan as a Regional Fulcrum: The Post-Sindhoor South Asian Strategic Landscape
Huma Rehman
Analysis Series
Analysis/0029/June/2026/London-Dialogue. 02 June 2026
A conflict that reshaped a region, the four days between May 6 and May 10, 2025, compressed decades of South Asian strategic calculus into a single, convulsive moment. India’s Operation Sindhoor, the most significant military strike on Pakistani targets since the war of 1971, was launched in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir that killed twenty-six civilians. A rare instance of large-scale drone warfare and missile exchanges between nuclear-armed rivals took place. It ushered in a new Indian political strategy; India placed the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, and Pakistan signalled retaliatory downgrading of bilateral frameworks, including the Simla Agreement. But the true aftershocks were not military bilateral; they were geopolitical, reshaping the regional balance in ways that continue to reverberate into 2026.
Pakistan’s Strategic Encounters in 2025
On the surface, the conflict appeared to favour India’s kinetic objectives. India violated the airspace of Pakistan and struck deep into the province of Punjab of Pakistan by hitting a missile near the Nur Khan airbase and other strategic premises. This demonstration of autonomous warfare intersected with the fog of nuclear signalling in ways that came dangerously close to regional calamity. Yet military outcomes in the twenty-first century are rarely decisive, and Pakistan demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to convert tactical adversity into strategic capital.
Pakistan sought to frame the crisis as a defence against escalation, while India framed it as counter-terror retaliation; international reporting shows key battlefield and attribution claims remained contested, creating space for narrative competition. The narrative battle fought across diplomatic corridors, UN chambers, and international media was one Pakistan prosecuted with remarkable sophistication. The conflict highlighted Pakistan’s restraint and strategic maturity, improving its global image compared to India’s perceived aggression.
The biggest constraint on Pakistan’s regional ambitions is not India; it is the two‑front reality. The Afghanistan border crisis that erupted in October 2025 underscored how quickly Pakistan can be dragged into kinetic confrontation on its western flank, with trade disruption, escalation risk, and domestic security blowback. In 2025 alone, over 1200 civilians and security personnel were killed by TTP attacks. Concurrently, improvement in the Afghan Taliban’s and New Delhi’s relations strained Islamabad-Kabul ties further. With diplomacy at a deadlock and rising terrorism, Pakistan launched Operation Ghazab lil Haq in February 2026, targeting Taliban positions in eastern Afghanistan amidst closed borders and collapsed trade.
The Architecture of Pakistan’s Regional Rise
Pakistan’s emergence as a genuine regional power post-May 2025 rests on three reinforcing pillars: military credibility, diplomatic agility, and great-power triangulation.
Military credibility entails the demonstration of Pakistan’s Armed Forces with a well-coordinated military strategy and impressive warfighting capabilities, which shattered the long-standing myth of India’s conventional military superiority. The reported engagement between Pakistani air-defence systems and Indian Rafale jets drew global attention. According to the Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung, the reported downing of an Indian Rafale jet by a Pakistani air-defence system raised concerns for Western military technologies. Undoubtedly, the world observed the maximalist Pakistani narrative of decisive victory; the episode conclusively dismantled the assumption that the technology gap between India and Pakistan was unbridgeable.
Pakistan demonstrated diplomatic agility by turning Trump 2.0 into a strategic opening, expanding cooperation from counterterrorism to minerals, energy, and trade. President Trump’s public praise for Pakistani leadership and his administration’s decision to re-hyphenate the US-Pakistan relationship were a diplomatic windfall that Pakistan had not enjoyed in nearly two decades. The war appeared to unify fractured Pakistani political forces domestically and resulted in Pakistan having a diplomatic advantage over India regarding Trump’s role and involvement in ceasefire actions. Trump’s announcement of the ceasefire was met with disapproval in New Delhi, and the US effort to place Pakistan and India as equals has been criticised by India. The re-hyphenation of the US-India relationship back toward US-Pakistan equivalence represents perhaps the most stinging strategic reversal for New Delhi since 9/11 reshuffled South Asian alignments in Islamabad’s favour.
Pakistan strategically expanded its space by signing SMDA with Saudi Arabia in September 2025. Though it binds both countries to defend each other against external aggression, however, it is not an automatic NATO-style operational guarantee. Instead, it is a demonstration of political intent while meaningfully enhancing Pakistan’s role in the Gulf’s security architecture.
For great-power triangulation, Pakistan demonstrated masterful positioning between Washington and Beijing. China has been a reliable strategic partner to Pakistan, a fact reaffirmed during the May 2025 conflict. Simultaneously, Pakistan leveraged its renewed ties with the US. Balancing both sides of the great powers, while India has long claimed as its own through ‘strategic autonomy’, Pakistan emerged from May 2025 with a broader patron base than at any point since the Cold War.
Additionally, enhanced trade, defence cooperation, and cultural exchanges with Central Asian Republics and African nations further broadened Pakistan’s geopolitical footprint. So far, Pakistan is sustaining simultaneous alignment with both the US and China without triggering a crisis of confidence in either relationship. It can be assessed by the prominent regional isolation of India, particularly in the recent Iran-US-Israel war scenario.
Critics will argue this is a victory-by-narrative that India achieved what it wanted, demonstrated reach, imposed costs, and kept escalation bounded, while Pakistan’s “win” is mostly rhetorical. And they’ll also say that India is not “isolated” so much as practising its familiar hedging: distancing itself from bloc statements (as it did when it declined to back the SCO condemnation of Israel’s June 2025 strikes on Iran) is precisely what strategic autonomy looks like. But that critique misses the larger shift, i.e., modern crises are adjudicated as much by international support and post-crisis bargaining as by crater counts. Even on contested battlefield claims, the episode produced real second-order effects, treaty leverage, third‑party mediation dynamics, and new security alignments that changed what the international community now believes is possible in South Asia.
Post-May 2025 India’s Echoing Diplomatic Isolation
While Pakistan consolidated gains, India found itself navigating an increasingly hostile geopolitical environment, one partly of its own making. The eruption of the US-Israel conflict with Iran in mid-2025 exposed the structural vulnerabilities of India’s much-vaunted strategic autonomy doctrine. India publicly distanced itself from the SCO’s condemnation of the June 2025 strikes on Iran, underscoring its challenge of balancing partnerships in West Asia.
Iran had historically been one of India’s most reliable backers on Kashmir in multilateral forums. That bilateral relationship has now been affected. India sits precariously in the US-Israel-led war against Iran because of Narendra Modi’s proximity to Israel’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu. The strategic entanglement is compounded by material interests. India reportedly had invested $120 million in the development of Chabahar Port in southeastern Iran, a critical entrepôt leading to Afghanistan and Central Asia, and reports indicate that recent US-Israel strikes specifically targeted Chabahar, which highlights the vulnerability of strategic infrastructure. The strategic connectivity project that India spent years constructing has been turned into rubble, a collateral casualty of a war India chose not to oppose.
One aspect of India’s alignment with Israel, reinforced by its heavy use of Israeli weapons systems in Operation Sindhoor, deeply compromised its credibility as a neutral actor in the Muslim world. The economic costs compound the diplomatic damage. The war in Iran is impacting India severely, including the Middle East, through disrupted remittances and energy imports, while India’s stock market fell for the fifth consecutive week as oil and gas prices continued to rise. On the other hand, Pakistan has emerged as a critical back-channel intermediary in the Iran conflict, a role that highlights India’s absence and isolation from diplomatic channels it has long claimed and sought to shape.
The events linking Operation Sindhoor and the Iran war ceasefire reflect a clear example of reciprocal diplomacy in action, illustrating how modern geopolitics operates in a highly interconnected and transactional environment where alliances are fluid and roles can shift rapidly.
The point to ponder is that India’s refusal to clearly align with either the US-Israel axis or the Russia-China-Iran bloc leaves it strategically exposed on every front simultaneously.
For decades, India’s doctrine of strategic autonomy, maintaining equidistance from competing blocs, was regarded as a mark of civilisational confidence and foreign policy sophistication. The concurrent crises of 2025 have revealed a darker dimension of this posture.
India has, in the past, expected diplomatic support from the international community on issues such as cross-border terrorism from Pakistan and China’s territorial claims. If India is perceived as hedging during other countries’ crises, it may find itself facing a similar situation in potential future tensions with Pakistan or China. Strategic autonomy risks eroding the relationships it might need in a future contingency.
The Road Ahead: A Recalibrated South Asia
Pakistan’s geopolitical profile increased because of its growing involvement in Middle Eastern security, but it also linked the state to unstable regional rivalries and great-power competition. The re-emergence of Pakistan as a regional power is a real-time occurrence. Although Pakistan faces a hostile Western neighbour and economic pressures from floods and inflation, it is holding a vital diplomatic front in the global canvas.
For India, the challenge is equally profound. Growing news reports that Pakistan is positioning itself as a mediator in the Iran conflict, coming in the context of the US administration’s confidence mainly in Pakistan, in the aftermath of the India-Pakistan 2025 conflict, which is not well accepted by India. In an era of transactional great-power competition, India finding a sustainable strategic identity with an autonomy doctrine without forfeiting its relevance is an impost.
The May 2025 conflict was not merely a military event; it was a geopolitical inflection point. Pakistan has leveraged the ambiguous outcome to re-establish itself as an indispensable regional actor, proving militarily credible, diplomatically active, and strategically positioned between the US and China. India, by contrast, portrays itself increasingly isolated, squeezed between a US-Israel alignment it cannot fully embrace, an Iran it has alienated, and a Pakistan whose regional stock is rising. The fog of war has cleared. But what remains is a South Asia whose strategic geometry has fundamentally shifted.
Huma Rehman
Related posts
The Maritime Blockade and the Strategic Calculus of the U.S., Iran, and Israel Toward a Renewed Armed Confrontation
Understanding Asim Munir’s Doctrine: Regime Security in Place of a National Goal
The Data Dilemma: Navigating the AI Systems Matrix
The Anatomy of a Shortfall: Europe’s Nine Capability Areas and the Lessons for Pakistan
From Quiet Diplomacy to Attempted Maritime Security Governance: Oman’s Role and Limits in the 2026 Strait of Hormuz Crisis
Anatomy of Asymmetry: How a Weaker State Converts Vulnerability into Leverage
Integration for Stability: The SDF’s Dissolution and Syria’s Security Order
The Western Flank Unravelled: Cross-Border Militancy, TTP Resurgence, and Afghan Taliban Governance
The Time of Guards Tank Divisions is Gone, or Maybe It is Not?
Re-pricing Israel’s Corridor: The Mecca Alliance and IMEC
The SCO at 25: From Regional Security Mechanism to Platform for a Multipolar Eurasia
Imran Khan: The Last Hope of a Nation
